|
Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia
46 (1) 2018
DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2018.46.1.003-015
|
Annotation:
Personal Ornament Production Technology
in the Early Holocene Complexes of Western Central Asia:
Insights from Obishir-5
A.Y. Fedorchenko1, S.V. Shnaider1, М.T. Krajcarz2, M.E. Romanenko3, А.K. Abdykanova4, К.А. Kolobova1, 5, S. Alisher kyzy3, W. Taylor6, and А.I. Krivoshapkin1, 3
1Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Akademika Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
2Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, Warsaw, 00-818, Poland
3Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 1, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
4American University of Central Asia, Aaly Tokombaev 7/6, Bishkek, 720060, Kyrgyz Republic
5Altai State University, Lenina 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia
6Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische St. 10, Jena, 07745, Germany
The stratified site of Obishir-5 is one of the most important Final Pleistocene to Early Holocene sites in western Central Asia. In the Early Holocene component (10,700–8200 cal BP) of this site (layers 2 and 3), we discovered one of the oldest and largest assemblages of soft stone ornaments known from the region. It includes 5 items: three oval, sub-triangular, and sub-rectangular pendants, one “labret”-like ornament, and one ornament blank. All specimens come from stratified and well-dated contexts. As a result of the petrographic, experimental, use-wear, and technological analysis, we reconstructed the chaine operatoire of these artifacts. To produce them, local raw materials (talcite and serpentinite) were from a source located 4.5 km away from the site. Small pebbles, shatters, and spalls split from nodules were used as blanks. The surface of the blank was first prepared using grinders and burins, then biconical drilling and polishing were used to finish the artifact. Our results point to an established tradition of personal ornament production from soft stone in western Central Asia during the Early Holocene. Comparison of these nonutilitarian artifacts with those from other Final Pleistocene to Early Holocene archaeological complexes across Central Asia, the Middle East, and the Near East suggests that personal ornament manufacture may be an important hallmark of social developments across a broad geographic region.
Keywords: Central Asia, Mesolithic, experimental use-wear analysis, technological analysis, symbolic behavior, personal ornaments, pendants.