Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 52 (2) 2024   doi:10.17746/1563-0110.2024.52.2.126-135

Annotation:  Who Were the Chagyrskaya Neanderthals? The Possibility of Their Dispersal Across Central Asia and S The “Makarovo” Component of Sosnovyi Bor, Southern Angara, Revisited Archaeological Collections from the Jomon Period in the Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and E Revisiting the Correlation Between the Valdivia and San Pedro Ceramic Complexes (Based on Technologi Testing the Sample Preparation Method and Oxygen Isotopic Analysis of Tooth Enamel for the Reconstru Radiocarbon Chronology of the Bronze Age Fedorovka Culture (New Data Relevant to an Earlier Problem) Metal Spearheads from the Bronze Age—New Finds in the Omsk Region The Geochemistry of Unalloyed Copper Metallurgical Group Indicates Copper Ore Sources in the Late Br New Data on Armed Confl icts in the Altai During the Rouran Period: The Choburak I Cemetery New Findings Relating to Bone Processing from Chernyatino-2, Primorye Boundaries, Structure, and Integrity of the Occupation Layer at the Gordinskoye I (Guryakar) Fortifi Miniature Anthropomorphic Sculptures from Ust-Voikary: Chronology, Context, Semantics Russian Orthodox Churches “Under the Bells”: Semantic Features and Origin of the Worldview The Tree-Clan-Individual Concept in Traditional Khakas Culture (Late 19th to Mid-20th Century) The Oral Panji Story Rendered by the Javanese Mask Puppet Show The Origin of the Karasuk People: Craniometric Evidence   

The Tree-Clan-Individual Concept in Traditional Khakas Culture
(Late 19th to Mid-20th Century)

V.A. Burnakov

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Akademika Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia

On the basis of ethnographic, folk, and linguistic materials, most of them newly-introduced, the “tree-clan-individual” concept in the Khakas culture is reconstructed and analyzed. The status and image of the tree in their traditional mythological and ritualistic system is assessed. Notions of man and his environment were related to anthropomorphic reasoning, by which natural objects, such as trees, were endowed with human attributes. In their religious-mythological views the tree was identified with a person, with the crown of the tree being the head, the trunk being the body, branches as being arms, sap as being blood, etc. Trees were believed to be either male or female. In the traditional consciousness, human life scenarios were closely paralleled to those of trees. The vegetative code was used to refer to various psychophysical, mental, and other human phenomena. Social norms included special rules in dealing with trees, used in logging. In essence, a tree had to be dealt with like a humanlike being. In mythological thinking, felling a tree was to some degree tantamount to murder. Souls of specific individuals or groups were likewise associated with trees, so each Khakas seok (clan) had a sacred tree. It was an integral part of the burial rite. The tree, then, was a key element in the ideological structure, having a broad semiotic field.

Keywords: Khakas, traditional worldview, tree cult, seok-clan, man, ancestor cult