Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 52 (2) 2024   doi:10.17746/1563-0110.2024.52.2.029-036

Annotation:  Who Were the Chagyrskaya Neanderthals? The Possibility of Their Dispersal Across Central Asia and S The “Makarovo” Component of Sosnovyi Bor, Southern Angara, Revisited Archaeological Collections from the Jomon Period in the Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and E Revisiting the Correlation Between the Valdivia and San Pedro Ceramic Complexes (Based on Technologi Testing the Sample Preparation Method and Oxygen Isotopic Analysis of Tooth Enamel for the Reconstru Radiocarbon Chronology of the Bronze Age Fedorovka Culture (New Data Relevant to an Earlier Problem) Metal Spearheads from the Bronze Age—New Finds in the Omsk Region The Geochemistry of Unalloyed Copper Metallurgical Group Indicates Copper Ore Sources in the Late Br New Data on Armed Confl icts in the Altai During the Rouran Period: The Choburak I Cemetery New Findings Relating to Bone Processing from Chernyatino-2, Primorye Boundaries, Structure, and Integrity of the Occupation Layer at the Gordinskoye I (Guryakar) Fortifi Miniature Anthropomorphic Sculptures from Ust-Voikary: Chronology, Context, Semantics Russian Orthodox Churches “Under the Bells”: Semantic Features and Origin of the Worldview The Tree-Clan-Individual Concept in Traditional Khakas Culture (Late 19th to Mid-20th Century) The Oral Panji Story Rendered by the Javanese Mask Puppet Show The Origin of the Karasuk People: Craniometric Evidence   

Archaeological Collections from the Jomon Period
in the Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography
(Kunstkamera)

D.A. Ivanova

Federal University, Ayaks 10, Russky Island, Vladivostok, 690922, Russia

This article presents an analysis and additional description of archaeological items of the Jomon period from A.V Grigoriev’s collection (No. 1294) at the Department of Archaeology of the Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) RAS in St. Petersburg. The study focuses on the description of decorative motifs and the stylistic attribution of selected samples of pottery. The analysis is based on the published data about the Omori shell mound (Tokyo, Honshu Island), visited by Grigoriev in 1878 as a part of the expedition from the Imperial Russian Geographical Society. The early stage of the Japanese archaeology is described with reference to the Omori shell mound. Special attention is given to specific features of the Jomon decorative style. The geographic location of the site suggests that the samples are associated with the Kasori B and Horinouchi styles. Contrary to the Russian tradition, the emphasis is made on stylistic interpretation rather than technology and typology. The combinations of large zonally arranged rectangular designs and spiral motifs are typical of the Kasori B style, to which several samples belong. Others reveal vertically and horizontally arranged patterns consisting of incised arcuate and straight lines, typical of the Horinouchi style.

Keywords: Japan, MAE, A.V. Grigoriev’s collections, Neolithic, Jomon, pottery