Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 50 (2) 2022   doi:10.17746/1563-0110.2022.50.2.060-070

Annotation:  The Incipient Neolithic of the Kurile Islands: The Culture of Long Barrows An Early Neolithic Sanctuary in the Eastern Irtysh Basin The Cultural Continuum of the Eurasian Boreal Zone and the Eastern Siberian Wedge (Based on Comparat A Bronze Age Shaft-Hole Axe from the Northwestern Baraba Forest-Steppe Bioarchaeology of Childhood in the Yamnaya Culture, Based on Kurgan 1 at Boldyrevo-4, the Southern U A Functional Analysis of Lithics of the Early Iron Age Yankovsky Culture: New Findings Burial of the Pazyryk Elite Members at Khankarinsky Dol, Northwestern Altai Analysis and Museumization of a Wooden Burial Structure from Pazyryk Kurgan 5, the Altai Mountains: Decorative Belts of Xianbei Period Nomads from Karban I, Northern Altai Occupation Layer at the Kushman Cluster of Sites (9th–13th Centuries) According to Multispectral Ima Philip Johan Tabbert von Strahlenberg: An 18th Century Swedish Prisoner’s Research in Siberia Rocks in the Religious Beliefs and Rites of the Ob Ugrians The Kyrgyz Republic: Concept, Strategies, and Practices for the Preservation of the National Cultura Paleogenetic Studies of Migration Processes in Eurasia Porotic Hyperostosis Observed in the 16th to 19th Century Crania of Native Siberians, Russian Settle   

A Functional Analysis of Lithics
of the Early Iron Age Yankovsky Culture:
New Findings

A.N. Popov¹, Kanomata Yoshitaka², M.K. Rudenko¹, and B.V. Lazin¹

¹Far Eastern Federal University, Ayaks 10, Russky Island, Vladivostok, 690922, Russia

²Tohoku University, Kawauchi 27-1, Aoba ward, Sendai, 980-8576, Japan

We present the results of a functional analysis of lithics of the Yankovsky culture (800 BC to the turn of the millennium) from two sites—Cherepakha-7 and Solontsovaya-2, excavated over large areas during salvage works in 2015 and 2017, respectively. Such tools are traditionally described as axes, adzes, chisels, knives, spearheads, and projectile points. Certain findings of the functional analysis disagree with this classification. The question arises of the correspondence between formal typological and traceological criteria. For functional analysis, the so-called Keeley method, or High Power Approach, was used, along with the classification of polishing types, elaborated at Tohoku University (Japan). Functions of 28 of the 62 tools selected for high-precision functional analysis were assessed. The existing nomenclature of woodworking tool types is clarified, information on the technique of harvesting herbaceous plants and on leatherworking tools is significantly specified. More details are provided on tools involved in bone carving, as well as those used to open shells of bivalve mollusks. The High Power Approach has enhanced our understanding of the functions of stone tools, which, despite the use of metals, were basic in Yankovsky technologies. Further directions of traceological studies are suggested.

Keywords: Primorye Territory, Early Iron Age, Yankovsky culture, functional analysis, lithics