Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 48 (3) 2020   DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2020.48.3.090-098

Annotation:  Who Were the Denisovans? Ocher in Late Paleolithic Contexts at the Kovrizhka IV Site, the Baikal-Patom Highlands (Eastern Sib Cave Sites of the Jomon Period in Taishaku Gorge, Western Japan An Unusual Fabric from Jety-Asar-2, Eastern Aral Sea Region, in the Context of the Central Asian Tex Petroglyphs of Mount Dyalbak, Eastern Altai Rich Burials of Children at Zeleny Yar, Northwestern Siberia Methodological Aspects of Determining Type, Age, and Origin of Archaeological Wood: The Case of Fort Cultural and Technological Characteristics of Russian Forged Iron Tools from the Selkup Cemetery Mig A Yakut Composite Bow from the Toybokhoy Museum An Eastern Tibetan Tool for Managing Draught Cattle On Sacred Girdles and Matrilineal Descent in Ainu Society Karakalpak Family Ritualism: The Bes Kiyim Custom in the Transformation of Traditional Culture Verbal Restrictions on the Communication of Turko-Mongols of Inner Asia The Use of Computed Tomography for the Study of Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis: Based on Crania from th   

Cultural and Technological Characteristics of Russian Forged Iron Tools
from the Selkup Cemetery Migalka in the Middle Ob Basin

L.A. Chindina¹ and N.M. Zinyakov²

¹Tomsk State University, Pr. Lenina 34, Tomsk, 634050, Russia

²Kemerovo State University, Krasnaya 6, Kemerovo, 650043, Russia

This study addresses Russian iron artifacts from the Narym Selkup cemetery Migalka, dating to the late 1600s to early 1700s. Two most important categories of tools are described—knives and axes. In terms of morphology, knives fall into two groups: straight-backed and those with convex (“humped”) backs. The combination of a “humpbacked” blade, typical of native manufacture, and Russian hilt plates precludes an unambiguous ethnic attribution. Special attention is paid to knives with filigree-enamel hilt plates as markers of high socio-economic status. The garniture evidences northern Russian origin. The metallographic analysis of knives (22% of the sample) revealed two technological groups: made of solid steel and welded. Axes, made by Russian artisans, are of the shaft-hole type and fall into four types. The analysis, relating to 42% of the sample, indicates two techniques: welding of a steel blade onto an iron base or a piece of raw steel, and using irregularly carbonized metal for forging the entire axe. Ferrous metal items follow the Russian technological traditions. Three key factors accounted for the spread of Russian artifacts among the natives: “Tsar's gift” for paying the yasak (tribute); colonization of Siberia followed by the emergence of trade manufacture; and the involvement of natives, specifically the Narym Selkups, in the all-Russian market. Our findings attest to the relevance of iron artifacts from archaeological sites to the historical and cultural studies of the colonization period in western Siberia.

Keywords: Narym (Middle Ob) Selkups, Migalka cemetery, late 17th-early 18th century, iron artifacts, technological analysis, tool types, historical-cultural context