R. Krause, A.V. Epimakhov, E.V. Kupriyanova, I.K. Novikov, and E. Stolarczyk. The Petrovka Bronze Age Sites: Issues in Taxonomy and Chronology
Проход по ссылкам навигации
RU

 
 

Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology
of Eurasia

47 (1) 2019

 

DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2019.47.1.054-063

Annotation:    

The Petrovka Bronze Age Sites: Issues in Taxonomy and Chronology

R. Krause1, A.V. Epimakhov2, E.V. Kupriyanova3, I.K. Novikov4, and E. Stolarczyk1

1Goethe-Universitat, Campus Westend, Norbert-Wollheim-Platz 1, Frankfurt am Main, 60323, Germany

2South Ural Department of the Institute of History and Archaeology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, South Ural State University, Pr. Lenina 76, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia

3Chelyabinsk State University, Bratyev Kashyrinykh 129, Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia

4Kurgan State University, Sovetskaya 63, bldg. 4, Kurgan, 640020, Russia

This article introduces a series of AMS radiocarbon dates for the Bronze Age Petrovka cemeteries in the Trans-Urals. The results of the AMS 14C-dating of animal and human bones indicate a very high degree of concordance in the 19th and 18th centuries cal BC time range. The previously obtained AMS datings clearly fit into the same chronological interval. Specifically, 17 of 36 analyses of the Petrovka series yielded very similar results. In other cases, where dating was based on wood and charcoal, the results are highly inconsistent, even within the same burial. Before the verification of these results, the short interval based on AMS dates should be preferred. Its comparison with intervals for other cultures of the Trans-Urals demonstrates marked similarity: in fact, complete coincidence of some of them. At the same time, stratigraphic and typological evidence suggests that the Sintashta, Petrovka, and Alakul traditions are stages of a sequence. Additional arguments are features of continuity in the material culture and the practice of using the burial mounds of a previous culture for new graves, without destroying the older ones. In our view, the only explanation is provided by a dynamic scenario of cultural change spanning two centuries, from the migration of the Sintashta people to Southern Urals until the formation of the Alakul culture. The resolution of the radiocarbon method does not suffice to detect such rapid changes. If this explanation is correct, the Petrovka sites should be considered an early stage of the Alakul culture, rather than a separate culture.

Keywords: Bronze Age, Petrovka sites, AMS radiocarbon dating