Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 53 (4) 2025   doi:10.17746/1563-0110.2025.53.4.082-091

Annotation:  The Dispersal of Denisovans and Neanderthals in China Pleistocene Communities of Large Mammals near Denisova Cave Biface Trimming Elements as Indicators of Tool Rejuvenation Intensity: The Case of Sibiryachikha, Al New Images of the Earliest Stratum at the Ust-Tuba III Rock Art Site Multidisciplinary Study of the Neolithic Pottery from Osinovoye Ozero, the Middle Amur Dung Temper in Neolithic Pottery of the Eastern Fertile Crescent as an Indicator of Animal Domestica Neolithic Ceramic Assemblages from the Upper and Middle Kama River: Raw Material Selection, Paste Pr An Early Metal Age Burial in Treugolnaya Cave, Primorye: A Multidisciplinary Study The Triunity of Images in Pazyryk Artistic Woodcarving A Radiocarbon Chronology of the Poltse I Settlement on the Amur River Sultanate Mosque Sites in Ahmedabad: New Insights into Urban Planning Symbolism of the Color Blue in the Ob Komi Culture Kite and Hawk in Buryat Traditional Worldview Paleogenetic Analysis of Individuals from Andronovo Double Burials at the Tartas-1 Cemetery, Baraba   

Neolithic Ceramic Assemblages from the Upper and Middle Kama River:
Raw Material Selection, Paste Preparation, and Decoration

N.S. Smertina

Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, Sibirskaya 24, Perm, 614990, Russia

Two archaeological cultures have been described at the sites on the Upper and Middle Kama in the Neolithic: the Kama culture, marked by ceramics with combed designs, and the Volga-Kama culture, whose distinctive feature is pottery with pricked designs. Vessels of both types sometimes co-occur. We analyze three types of ceramic assemblages depending on decoration: combed, pricked, and mixed. Apart from the morphology of the vessels, we describe their technology, using binocular microscopy, traceology, modeling, and petrographic analysis. As a result, ceramic traditions typical of each group are revealed. The most common temper is grog. Mixed (combed and pricked) decoration testifies to contact between various traditions, evidenced by a smaller proportion of combed designs on grog-tempered pottery. At the middle stage, grog temper associated with pricked designs becomes more common. The blend of traditions is also evidenced by the use of unsanded raw materials in crushed form for the pottery with pricked designs in mixed assemblages, and by the appearance of inward-beveled rims (thickened or not) on vessels with pricked designs. It is attempted to trace the evolution and further spread of various ceramic types.

Keywords: Ceramics, Neolithic, Upper and Middle Kama, Kama culture, Volga-Kama culture, technological and typological analysis