Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 53 (4) 2025   doi:10.17746/1563-0110.2025.53.4.041-051

Annotation:  The Dispersal of Denisovans and Neanderthals in China Pleistocene Communities of Large Mammals near Denisova Cave Biface Trimming Elements as Indicators of Tool Rejuvenation Intensity: The Case of Sibiryachikha, Al New Images of the Earliest Stratum at the Ust-Tuba III Rock Art Site Multidisciplinary Study of the Neolithic Pottery from Osinovoye Ozero, the Middle Amur Dung Temper in Neolithic Pottery of the Eastern Fertile Crescent as an Indicator of Animal Domestica Neolithic Ceramic Assemblages from the Upper and Middle Kama River: Raw Material Selection, Paste Pr An Early Metal Age Burial in Treugolnaya Cave, Primorye: A Multidisciplinary Study The Triunity of Images in Pazyryk Artistic Woodcarving A Radiocarbon Chronology of the Poltse I Settlement on the Amur River Sultanate Mosque Sites in Ahmedabad: New Insights into Urban Planning Symbolism of the Color Blue in the Ob Komi Culture Kite and Hawk in Buryat Traditional Worldview Paleogenetic Analysis of Individuals from Andronovo Double Burials at the Tartas-1 Cemetery, Baraba   

Biface Trimming Elements as Indicators of Tool Rejuvenation Intensity:
The Case of Sibiryachikha, Altai

A.V. Kharevich¹, K.A. Kolobova^{1, 2}, I.E. Tyugashev¹, V.M. Kharevich¹, P.V. Chistyakov¹, S.V. Markin¹, and A.P. Derevianko^{1, 2}

¹Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Akademika Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia

²Altai State University, Pr. Lenina 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia

Biface trimming elements represent an important diagnostic source of information for studying various stages of bifacial tool production. In Middle Paleolithic assemblages, they often constitute a significant portion of the sample, making them particularly useful for identifying specific technological operations such as primary reduction and shaping of bifacial preforms, edge formation and retouching, working edge rejuvenation, and modification of bifacial tools. Here, we present the findings of a systematic typological analysis of biface trimming elements. Through a comprehensive metric and morphological analysis of experimental collections and Middle Paleolithic assemblages representing the Sibiryachikha industries of the Altai, we have developed a refined typology of technical spalls with regard to local archaeological specificity. Our analysis revealed no statistically significant differences either between parameters of type 0 and type 1 spalls or between those of type 2 and type 3, suggesting that these groups correspond to specific technological operations. In contrast, type 4 and type 5 technical spalls, which indicate onsite tool modification, show significant metric differences. The results demonstrate functional and technological distinctions between the assemblages. Materials from Chagyrskaya Cave are especially indicative of primary edge retouching and tool shaping, while the Okladnikov Cave industry mostly evidences maintenance and modification of bifacial tools.

Keywords: Middle Paleolithic, Altai, Micoquian, technical spalls, typology, bifacial technology