Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 52 (3) 2024   doi:10.17746/1563-0110.2024.52.3.127-135

Annotation:  The Origin of H. s. denisovan and Their Dispersal Across Iran Methodological Issues in Pollen Analysis of Pleistocene Deposits in Denisova Cave Small Blade and Bladelet Production in Central Asia at the Turn of MIS 7 and 6: Cores from Kulbulak Identification of Adhesives for Repairing Ancient Ceramics: The Case of the Neolithic and Chalcolith Slag Inclusions in Iron Artifacts from Cemeteries at Kichigino I and Krasnaya Gorka, and the Metallu Radiocarbon Chronology and Isotope Data of Ust-Tartasskiye Kurgany Mound 51, the Baraba Forest-Stepp Raw Materials in the Paste of Ceramics of the Kulaika Culture Surgut Variant (Based on Samples from A Bronze Age Site on the Northern Coast of West Java Microstructural Study of Medieval Crucible Steels from Archaeological Sites in Central and Northwest Textiles from the Ust-Voikary Hillfort Site (Based on Materials from 2012–2016 Excavations) Shaman Tambourines of the Northern Ob Ugrians (18th to Early 21st Centuries) Principal Results of the Project Implemented by the Research and Educational Center for Altaic and T Bony Labyrinth in Upper Paleolithic Individuals Buried at Sungir The Structure of the Late Bronze Age Population of Western Siberia: Craniometric Evidence Affinities of the Sargat Population in the Baraba Forest-Steppe Application of the Decision Tree Method for Differentiating Human Groups   

The Structure of the Late Bronze Age Population of Western Siberia: Craniometric Evidence

A.G. Kozintsev

Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera), Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 3, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

To assess the sources of population differentiation in Late Bronze Age Western Siberia, measurements of 68 cranial samples of this and earlier periods were processed with multivariate statistical methods. Results support the idea of at least two post-Afanasyevo migrations to Siberia from the west—pre-Andronovo and Andronovo. The former was represented by Chaa-Khol, Yelunino, and Samus people. Those associated with Karakol culture partly resemble the above and partly both autochthonous populations—that of Baraba (“Northern Eurasian formation”) and that of Okunev culture (“Southern Eurasian formation”), which appear to be two extremes of a single continuum. Differences between the two Andronovo traditions, Fedorovka and Alakul, are likely due to the local substratum in the former rather than to various origins. The Karasuk group arose through admixture between Okunev and Andronovo. People associated with the classic Karasuk culture are closer to the former, while those of the Kamenny Log stage tend toward the latter. People of the Upper Irtysh and the Mongun-Taiga people from Baidag III resemble those of Karasuk. Two pooled groups, Irmen and Mongun-Taiga, and the Pakhomovskaya sample indicate a possible admixture between both autochthonous formations, Northern and Southern, as well as Andronovo and Karasuk. Among the so-called Andronoid groups, only Yelovka and Pakhomovskaya, as well as a sample from Yelovka I, suggest admixture between Andronovans and Western Siberian natives, while Cherkaskul and Korchazhka, like the Late Krotovo groups from Sopka and Cherno-Ozerye and the Begazy-Dandybai group of Baraba, deviate from the Northern Eurasian formation toward Okunev rather than Andronovo. Among the two Eurasian formations, the Southern one (i.e., Okunev) was more affected by admixture between the autochthones and the immigrants.

Keywords: Western Siberia, Bronze Age, Northern Eurasian formation, Southern Eurasian formation, Okunev culture, Andronovo culture, Karasuk culture