Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 46 (2) 2018   DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2018.46.2.052-059

Annotation:  Excavations at Darvagchay-Zaliv-4: An Early Paleolithic Site in Dagestan Argillite Artifacts and Final Pleistocene to Middle Holocene Cultural Links Across the Vitim River B Late Krotovo (Cherno-Ozerye) Burials with Casting Molds from Tartas-1, Baraba Forest-Steppe The Andronovo Age Women’s Costume, Based on Finds from Maytan, Central Kazakhstan Textile Decoration and Patterns on the Andronovo Vessels: Possible Reconstructions A Study of Bronze Age Ceramics from the Forest Zone of Eastern Europe: What Does the Term “Fatyanovo Petroglyphs of Zanskar, India: Findings of the 2016 Season Offerings of Hunnic-type Artifacts in Stone Enclosures at Altynkazgan, the Eastern Caspian Region Old Turkic Stone Enclosures at Kyzyl-Shin, Southeastern Altai New Data on Iron-Smelting Sites in the Kuektanar and Turgun Valleys, Southeastern Altai The Technology of Manufacturing Glass Beads at Gnezdovo, Smolensk Region Mongol Warriors of the Jochi Ulus at the Karasuyr Cemetery, Ulytau, Central Kazakhstan Silver Vessels of the Golden Horde Era from the Middle Ob Basin The Cemetery at Fort Umrevinsky, in the Upper Ob Basin Remains of Brown Bear (Ursus arctos L.) from the Kaninskaya Cave Sanctuary in the Northern Urals Animal Bones in Ritual Accumulations at Monkys Uriy Manifestation of Worldviews in Traditional Narratives: Reconstruction of Global Tendencies in the Sp   

A Study of Bronze Age Ceramics
from the Forest Zone of Eastern Europe:
What Does the Term “Fatyanovo-like” Mean?

E.V. Volkova

Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Dm. Ulyanova 19, Moscow, 117036, Russia

The Bronze Age ceramics from the forest zone of Eastern Europe include a category that is often described as “Fatyanovo-like”. These reveal a blend of predominantly Fatyanovo and other features. A morphological and technological analysis of 129 vessels from Nikolo-Perevoz I (a settlement with a collective burial) and II has revealed four groups––one Fatyanovo proper and three evidencing a mixture of Fatyanovo with local traditions of various origins. The Fatyanovo-Volosovo group appears to have been a result of local mixture, whereas that from the burial is close to the Fatyanovo-Osh-Pando tradition, which had been introduced from without. These findings are relevant to the relationships between the Fatyanovo, Volosovo, and Osh-Pando people. They also demonstrate that the umbrella term “Fatyanovo-like” is meaningless.

Keywords: Bronze Age, Fatyanovo culture, ceramics, technological analysis, morphological analysis