Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 44 (1) 2016 document link DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2016.44.1.114-122

Annotation:  Levantine Middle Pleistocene Blade Industries Continuity and Change in the Late Pleistocene Lithic Industries of the Central Zagros: A Typo-Techno Variation in Middle and Upper Paleolithic Reduction Technology at Kara-Bom, the Altai Mountains: Ref Different Models of Settlement of the Upper Paleolithic Cultures in the Northern Foreland of the Mor Metal-Production, Mortuary Ritual, and Social Identity: The Evidence of Sintashta Burials, Southern The Function of Pebble-Tools from Late Bronze Age Sites in the Tobol Forest-Steppe: An Experimental A Ritual Complex with Deer Stones at Uushigiin Uvur, Mongolia: Composition and Construction Stages ( Platinoid Microinclusions of a Native Osmium Group in Ancient Gold Artifacts from Siberia and the Ur “Protecting the Mistress”: A Plaque with an Anthropomorphic Representation, from Shuryshkary, Yamal- What History Says Versus What Archaeology Shows: Sources and Methods in the Study of Russian Culture The Introduction of the Domesticated Horse in Southwest Asia The Nagaybaks: From Social Stratum to Ethnic Group (the Origins of Ethnic Identity) An Upper Paleolithic Mandible from Listvenka, Siberia: A Revision   

WHAT HISTORY SAYS VERSUS WHAT ARCHAEOLOGY SHOWS: SOURCES AND METHODS IN THE STUDY OF RUSSIAN CULTURE IN SIBERIA

M.P. Chernaya

Tomsk State University, Pr. Lenina 36, Tomsk, 634050, Russia

Over the last two decades, archaeological study of Russian sites in Siberia has expanded not only in scale and geography, but also in its scope. As a result, the archaeology of Russian towns in Siberia has turned into a separate fi eld of Siberian studies. Excavations of sites from the last third of the 16th century to the 19th century have had a positive impact on the public perception of historical Russian towns as an integral part of Russian historical and cultural heritage, and on the perception of historical archaeology as an invaluable source of historical knowledge. It is extremely important that this transformation in perception is gradually being acknowledged by historians, who until recently tended to monopolize historical reconstructions of Muscovy and the Russian Empire, and to consider the written sources to be self-suffi cient. Today archaeology sets up a broader framework for research into this pivotal period. This article outlines the fi ndings of archaeological excavations at old Russian sites in Siberia, juxtaposing them with the written evidence. The comparison is based on the examples of (1) localizing historical sites and providing attribution for excavated sites; (2) creating spatial models of archaeological wooden structures; and (3) reconstructing the composition of livestock through faunal remains.

Keywords: Historical archaeology, sources, methods, reconstructions, Siberia, Russian culture.

REFERENCES

Aleksandrov V.A., Lipinskaya V.A., Safyanova A.V. 1981 Zhilishche i khozyaistvennye postroiki russkogo krestyanstva Sibiri. In Etnografi ya russkogo krestyanstva Sibiri (XVII – seredina XIX v.). Moscow: Nauka, pp. 102–141.

Antipina E.E. 2006 Vozmozhnosti rekonstruktsii sostava stada domashnikh zhivotnykh v arkheologii. In Sovremennye problemy arkheologii Rossii: Materialy Vserossiyskogo arkheologicheskogo syezda, vol. 2. Novosibirsk: Izd. IAE SO RAN, pp. 339–342.

Arkheologiya drevnego Yaroslavlya: Zagadki i otkrytiya. 2012 [Second edition]. Moscow: IA RAN.

Bachura O.P., Lobanova T.V., Bobkovskaya N.E. 2011 Zhivotnovodstvo russkogo naseleniya v gorodakh na severe Urala i Sibiri v XVII–XIX vv. In Kultura russkikh v arkheologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: Mezhdistsiplinarnye metody i tekhnologii. Omsk: Izd. Omsk. Inst. (fi l.) RGTEU, pp. 271–275.

Belyaev L.A. 2014 Arkheologiya pozdnego Srednevekoviya i Novogo vremeni v Rossii: Zametki o samoopredelenii. In Kultura russkikh v arkheologicheskikh issledovaniyakh, vol. 1. Omsk, Tyumen, Yekaterinburg: Magellan, pp. 11–17.

Belyaev L.A., Veksler A.G. 1996 Arkheologiya srednevekovoi Moskvy (itogi issledovaniy 1980–1990-kh gg.). Rossiyskaya arkheologiya, No. 3: 106–133.

Blomkvist E.E., Gantskaya O.A. 1967 Tipy russkogo krestyanskogo zhilishcha serediny XIX – nachala XX v. In Russkiye: Istoriko-etnograficheskiy atlas (zemledeliye, krestyanskoe zhilishche, krestyanskaya odezhda serediny XIX – nachala XX v.). Moscow: Nauka, pp. 131–165.

Chernaya M.P. 2002 Tomskiy kreml serediny XVII – XVIII v.: Problemy rekonstruktsii i istoricheskoi interpretatsii. Tomsk: Izd. Tomsk. Gos. Univ.

Chernaya M.P. 2008 Russkaya arkheologiya kak novoye napravleniye v sibirevedenii. In Moskovskaya Rus: Problemy arkheologii i istorii arkhitektury. Moscow: IA RAN, pp. 482–515.

Chernaya M.P. 2011 Rol russkogo goroda v osvoenii Sibiri: Dialektika vozmozhnostei i istoricheskoi praktiki. In Kultura russkikh v arkheologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: Mezhdistsiplinarnye metody i tekhnologii. Omsk: Izd. Omsk. Inst. (fi l.) RGTEU, pp. 7–16.

Chernaya M.P. 2013 Metodiko-istochnikovedcheskiye podkhody k resheniyu problemy lokalizatsii istoricheskikh obyektov. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Istoriya, No. 3: 81–90.

Chernaya M.P. 2014 Vozmozhnosti rekonstruktsii vysotnykh derevyannykh postroek v arkheologii (metodicheskiy kommentariy). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 382: 133–139.

Chizhikova L.N. 1987 Zhilishche. In Etnografi ya vostochnykh slavyan: Ocherki traditsionnoi kultury. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 223–258.

Devyashin M.M., Plasteyeva N.A. 2010 Nekotorye aspekty ispolzovaniya zhivotnykh pervymi russkimi poselentsami v Zapadnoi Sibiri. Trudy Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. obshchenauchnaya, vol. 273 (1): 49–51.

Dmitrienko N.M. 2010 K voprosu o meste osnovaniya g. Tomska. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Istoriya, vol. 2: 91–108.

Gorokhov S.V. 2011 Umrevinskiy ostrog kak arkheologicheskiy istochnik. Cand. Sc. (History) Dissertation. Novosibirsk.

Istoricheskaya ekologiya naseleniya severa Zapadnoi Sibiri. 2013 G.P. Vizgalov, O.V. Kardash, P.A. Kosintsev, T.V. Lobanova. Nefteyugansk: Inst. arkheologii Severa; Yekaterinburg: Izd. AMB.

Koledinsky L.V. 2012 Vitalitivnaya kultura Vitebska v kontse XIII – nachale XIV v. (po materialam raskopok Verkhnego zamka). In Polatsk u gіstoryі і kultury Europy: Materyyaly Mіzhnar. navuk. kanf. Polatsk, 22–23 maya 2012 g. Mіnsk: pp. 437–455.

Kuzmina F.S. 1974 K voprosu o sostoyanii skotovodstva v krestyanskikh khozyaistvakh Tomskoi gubernii. In Voprosy sotsialnoekonomicheskogo polozheniya krestyan Sibiri v XIX – nachale XX v. Novosibirsk: Nauka, pp. 3–16.

Matveyev A.V. 2011 V poiskakh mesta gibeli atamana Ermaka. In Kultura russkikh v arkheologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: Mezhdistsiplinarnye metody i tekhnologii. Omsk: Izd. Omsk. Inst. (fi l.) RGTEU, pp. 127–144.

Matveyev A.V., Anoshko O.M. 2012 Ermakova perekop na starinnykh kartakh i v materialakh polevogo istoriko-arkheologicheskogo obsledovaniya. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 2: 275–281.

Milchik M.I., Ushakov Y.S. 1981 Derevyannaya arkhitektura russkogo Severa: Stranitsy istorii. Leningrad: Stroyizdat.

Miloslavsky M.G. 1956 Tekhnika derevyannogo zodchestva na Rusi v XVI–XVII vv. Trudy Instituta istorii, estestvoznaniya i tekhniki, vol. 7: 44–111.

Ocherki istorii goroda Tomska (1604–1954). 1954 Tomsk: Otdel izd. i poligraf. promysh. Uprav. kultury Tomsk. oblispolkoma.

Ot Smuty k imperii: Novye otkrytiya v oblasti arkheologii i istorii Rossii XVI–XVIII vekov. 2013 Moscow: IA RAN.

Petrov N.M. 1956 Opyt vosstanovleniya plana Tomskogo goroda i ostroga nachala XVII v. Trudy Tomskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya, vol. 5: 59–78.

Pikul V.S. 1991 Istoricheskiye miniatyury, vol. 1. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya.

Popov A.I. 1959 Tomsk. Moscow: Gosstroyizdat.

Rabinovich M.G. 1975 Russkoye zhilishche v XIII–XVII vv. In Drevneye zhilishche narodov Vostochnoi Evropy. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 156–244.

Rappoport P.A. 2013 O metodike izucheniya drevnerusskogo zodchestva. In Idem. Arkhitektura srednevekovoi Rusi: Izbrannye statyi. St. Petersburg: Liki Rossii, pp. 47–60.

Skobelev S.G. 2001 Rezultaty i problemy rekonstruktsii vneshnego vida Sayanskogo ostroga. In Integratsiya arkheologicheskikh i etnograficheskikh issledovaniy. Nalchik, Omsk: [s.l.], pp. 116–121.

Skryabina L.A. 1997 Russkiye Pritomiya: Istoriko-etnograficheskiye ocherki (XVII – nachalo XX v.). Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat.

Tataurov S.F. 2011 Gorod Tara – s chistogo lista. In Kultura russkikh v arkheologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: Mezhdistsiplinarnye metody i tekhnologii. Omsk: Izd. Omsk. Inst. (fi l.) RGTEU, pp. 242–250.

Tomsk: Istoriya goroda v illyustratsiyakh. 1604–2004. 2004 Tomsk: Izd. Tomsk. Gos. Univ.

Tsalkin V.I. 1956 Materialy dlya istorii skotovodstva i okhoty v drevnei Rusi. Moscow: Izd. AN SSSR. (MIA; iss. 51).

Vlasova I.V. 2001 Severorusskaya krestyanskaya usadba: Tipy zhilykh postroek XVI–XVIII vv. In Russkiy Sever: Etnicheskaya istoriya i narodnaya kultura XII–XX veka. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 199–207.

Volkov G.V. 2005 Mesto raspolozheniya pervoi tomskoi kreposti. In Teoriya i praktika razvitiya v khudozhestvennykh muzeyakh Sibiri. Tomsk: Izd. Tomsk. Gos. Univ., pp. 127–130.

Voronin N.N. 1934 Ocherki po istorii russkogo zodchestva XVI–XVII vv. Moscow, Leningrad: Sotsekgiz.