|
Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia
37 (4) 2009
|
Annotation:
Craniometric Evidence of the Early Caucasoid Migrations to Siberia and Eastern Central Asia, with
Reference to the Indo-European Problem
A.G. Kozintsev.
Measurements of 220 male Neolithic and Bronze Age cranial series from Eurasia were subjected to multivariate
statistical analysis. The results support the idea that people associated with the Catacomb culture played a major role
in the origin of the Afanasyev culture. Okunev people of the Minusinsk Basin, those associated with Karakol, Ust-
Tartas, and Krotovo cultures, and those buried in the Andronov-type cemeteries at Cherno-ozerye and Yelovka were of
predominantly local Siberian origin. The Samus series resembles that from Poltavka burials. The Okunev people of Tuva
and probably Yelunino people were likely descendants of the Pit Grave (Yamnaya) and early Catacomb populations of
the Ukraine. The same is true of the Alakul people of western Kazakhstan, who in addition, have numerous affi nities
amongst Neolithic and Early Bronze Age groups of Central and Western Europe. The probable ancestors of certain
Fedorov populations were the Afanasyev tribes of the Altai, whereas other Fedorov groups apparently descended from
late Pit Grave and Catacomb tribes of the Northern Caucasus and the northwestern Caspian. People of Gumugou are
closest to Fedorov groups of northeastern Kazakhstan and Rudny Altai, suggesting that Caucasoids migrated to Xinjiang
from the north rather than from the west. Describing the gracile Caucasoids of Siberia and Eastern Central Asia as
“Mediterraneans” is misleading since they display virtually no craniometric ties with the Near Eastern, Southwestern
Central Asian or Transcaucasian groups. The totality of evidence suggests that they were Nordics.
Keywords: Indo-Europeans, Indo-Iranians, Tocharians, Southern Siberia, Western Siberia, Central Asia, Bronze Age,
craniometry.